CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted / Non Assisted

To: "'Ken Widelitz'" <widelitz@gte.net>, "'CQ CONTEST'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted / Non Assisted
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to: k5zd@charter.net
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:27:27 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Thanks Ken.  You correctly summarized the intent of my post.  I would like
to see single ops not be forced into the multi-op category.  I would like to
see those contests that do not have SOA not add new categories.

Randy K5ZD


> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Ken Widelitz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 12:48 AM
> To: 'CQ CONTEST'
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Assisted / Non Assisted
> 
> This thread started when Randy, K5ZD, wrote:
> 
> "For these contests where there is no assisted category, instead of
> making yet another category, why not just allow single ops to use
> assistance?!"
> 
> Note, he wrote "For these contests where there is NO assisted
> category..."
> 
> There are not too many of those types of contest. Certainly CQWW, of
> which he is the contest director, is NOT one of those, as there are
> assisted categories for Single OP (All-Band or Single Band) in each of
> three power categories.
> 
> Let's not get too bent out of shape. I don't think you can read between
> the lines that CQWW is considering changing this.
> 
> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>