CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] contest clubs and boundaries

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] contest clubs and boundaries
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:07:54 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ummm you said youhave 200+ members but cal only allow 100 to play,

you were the one to say this not I.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 2/2/2013 8:10 PM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:
Some clubs may do that...we do not.  It is in the best interest of
contesting in general to have as many members partcipate as possible.   You're
suggesting that only N4WW, K1TO, K5KG, NF4A, K9ES myself and a couple of  other
big guns submit scores to qualify for the small club first place?  We
should encourage the other 200+ members not to participate or submit scores so
we can accomplish that goal?
I've been contesting in ham radio over 45 years and have never heard anyone
  suggest that.
Bill K4XS/KH7XS In a message dated 2/2/2013 8:15:57 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,
nss@mwt.net writes:

Play it  just like a being Super Bowl time,  you play your best players.
When  in a contest or superbowl, you play your best players and sit out
the not  so good ones.  If the best can't play you bring in the second
string.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>