Adding digital information to assist the other station to decode your
call is not SSB.
In case this kind of technology would surface (and it would be
allowed), many contests would need a new entry category.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
2013/2/28 Marijan Miletic, S56A <s56a@bit.si>:
> W3TX wrote: An SSB skimmer could be devised without speech decoding. Simply
> embedding a digital sub audible footprint within the SSB would do the job.
>
>
>
> Interesting concept on the first sight but hamradio does not use precise
> channel frequencies. Subaudible signal becomes loud outside of suppressed
> carrier zero beat. SSB bandwidth would be increased. I guess cost/benefit
> ratio is still positive.
>
>
>
> LP MMM S56A
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|