CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...

To: "RT Clay" <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...
From: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:31:23 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Go ahead and do it, and enter as 5A as Tor suggests.

Who cares whether you're 4A or 5A ?

de W5OV



>
>
>>This would be a two-op single-band position, two ops with one either
>>listening to the run frequency or tuning the band for other stations.
>>
>>I wanted to show this "bip-bop" two-operator single-band configuration to
>>people in the club I'm operating with (not all contesters).
>>
>>If three other transmitters are in use at our station, is this still
>>illegal??   Again, it does not make sense to me if it is.
>
>
> Yes, it is illegal under the new rules. You have 5 operators and radios
> but are
> using a lockout
> so that only 4 transmit at once so you can claim 4A.
>
> If you want to do that you should enter as 5A.
>
> Tor
> N4OGW
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>