I agree just saying "I want a new scoring system because scores are
unexplainable and people cheat" is irresponsible.. If somebody has proof of
cheatingyou need to just flat out say it . ... .it's very easy to smear
people's reputation..but you need to talk the talk!
73 de HK3CW Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] In the light of the 2013 CQ WW DX CW
Claimedscores.
Oh?
Which scores? Why do you think they're unexplainable?
A blanket assertion like this without details directly or indirectly
smears, or could smear, the reputations quite a few operators.
While I can't speak for anyone else, I'd certainly want more information
about what is allegedly happening before even beginning to consider
revamps or changes, let alone agreeing to them.
73
On 12/04/13, Martin , LU5DX wrote:
I really hope at least some of you would agree that a revamp of the
observer program is needed.
There are scores that are really unexplainable.
Hopefully cheaters will get disqualified (again).
Vy 73.
Martin, LU5DX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|