Oh there is a few good reasons here from EU why some refuse to respond
to these 'discussions';
- Our critical input often does not appear here
- Whatever diplomacy used, as soon as we seem to *touch someones
personal toy-preference* we get bad mouthed by US hams, describing our
view as the worst on the planet, calling us names etc. (that kind of
content is NOT moderated by the way)
- Similar experiences was confirmed by others to me off-line
For me, I was able to put things back in sync positively with those via
direct mail; there is no fulfillment in a maintaining a dispute, let
alone calling names, ever.
However, I do refrain from entering discussions where those few here who
rule it all and are not willing to accept there are hams with a
different opinion. Live and let live.
Rather go contesting.
Enjoyed a GREAT 160m CW weekend.
Hope you all enjoyed it too.
73 Mark, PA5MW
On 27-1-2014 19:41, David Gilbert wrote:
Is there a reason why every active contest station outside North
America and Europe doesn't regularly post their operating
preferences/practices/biases to this reflector like Charlie does? Are
they just too lazy or is there some other reason why Charlie seems to
be the only one?
Dave AB7E
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|