CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes
From: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:31:44 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I've been working the ARRL Centennial (100 points for each station I contact). I find at least one, sometimes a half dozen or more, dupes during one of my 30 minutes to and hour session on a band/mode (typically 100 to 180 per hour). Yes, the Centennial is classified as an "operating event" but many folks seem to want to collect points. It takes perhaps 10 seconds of "my super valuable time" to work a dupe, while it would take me longer to explain that they are already in my log, et. nausea

And, when I CALL a "runnning" station, and he/she says I'm a dupe, I ask "when", and often find I've transposed a couple letters in the call, or have a wrong number in the prefix, etc. It would save us both considerable time to "just work me" and be done with it.

For the life of me, I can't see why people don't "just work dupes" and be done with it. What's the frustration in working a dupe, anyway? Is 10 seconds of one's time a "make or break" situation?

If one were to search the archives ot CQ-Contesting@contesting.com, I'm sure the word "dupes" would come up back to the days of the sp*rk gap (if the internet were that old, at least.)

72/73 de n8xx Hg
DUPES forever, Dupes forever, is my cry. D U P E S or die! (to paraphrase a cheerleading team form my high school_)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes, Hank Greeb <=