there seems to be ways of checking for QRP operation, like actually
SEEING the final, measuring the final plate/collector voltage and
current, unhooking the coax, hooking up a piece of coax with a non
inductive resistor and measuring the RMS with a calibrated scope, putting
your thumb on the final heat sink, bringing your own calibrated by the
NBS power meter, bringing your own rig and hooking it up to the antennas,
going so far as hooking up a piece of your coax to the antenna and
running it to your own rig.....
mike w7dra
On Sat, 16 May 2015 10:55:56 -0400 Herbert Schoenbohm
<herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com> writes:
> Felipe,
>
> I don't know how just changing the operator will prove anything at
> all.
> What I know to a moral certainty is the comparison on KP4TE alleged
> QRP
> signal on ground wave and that of NP4A's full power signal from a
> great
> location with a superb antenna system at the same time. This proved
> to
> me that KP4KE's claim of running "4.7 watts to a double bazooka"
> when
> he established his published record that his QRP" entry was totally
>
> bogus. The signal measurements made here of the two stations in
> comparison do not lie.
>
> Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
>
> On 5/16/2015 8:03 AM, Felipe J. Hernández wrote:
> > To address Herb's comments:
> >
> > We had an honest conversation with kp4ke regarding the questions
> around his
> > qrp and other operations.
> > HE has agreed to allow ERic Np3a to operate his station and to
> show the
> > world how his station performs in qrp, the official date set by
> him was on
> > wpx cw this year.
> >
> > Certainly we are anxious as you to make sure that these were all
> valid
> > entries, let's wait for wpx and see.
> >
> > 73's
> >
> > Felipe
> > NP4Z
> >
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:52:26 -0400
> > From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle
> > Message-ID: <5553814A.9070103@vitelcom.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> >
> > There are others in the record book essentially in perpetuity. The
> fact
> > that CQ Contesting still posts some of the biggest malefactors,
> i.e. the
> > low band QRP world records of an infamous station in KP4, just
> prevents
> > others from even giving such an impossible score a legitimate
> challenge.
> > These were certainty challenged and with the adequate proof of the
> fact
> > that the were the result of cheating. But since CQ let this matter
> just
> > slide and didn't properly DQ, it stands as a detriment to radio
> > contesting for those who follow the rules and as an encouragement
> to
> > those who don't .
> >
> > Looking ahead, either we slay this beast of contesting as we know
> it
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
____________________________________________________________
Forget the iPhone 6
1 little-known Apple supplier holds wealth-changing growth potential.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/55576f165864d6f161393st02vuc
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|