CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Latency and Code Readers...

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Latency and Code Readers...
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:55:55 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

I doubt that's the problem at all. I'm not trying to defend code readers, but I hear the same "latency" on SSB reports just as much as I do on CW ... maybe even more. To be honest, on SSB it seems to come mostly from older hams based upon the sound of their voices. Age does slow things down for some people, and ham radio is an aging hobby.

Dave   AB7E



On 12/22/2015 11:25 AM, Lloyd Cabral wrote:
While we're on the subject of latency, does anyone want to guess what percentage of 
"casual" CW ops are

using code readers these days?      We've always attributed the casual operator 
"delayed response" to code

readers but perhaps we're mistaken.

  73,  Lloyd  KH6LC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>