CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:42:23 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
For the guys in the top-10 ("the guys that win all the time"), you would lose that bet.

Thanks to the RBN, it is very easy to identify "curiously strong" stations. In past NAQP's, a number of those stations have seen their scores mysteriously disappear in the final results.

73,
Steve, N2IC


On 01/08/2016 08:35 AM, Bob Poortinga wrote:
Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote:

The guys that win all the time typically run HP in other contests anyway.

And I'll bet that some of them run HP in NAQP, either willfully or due
to ignorance of the rules.

Bob NG9M
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>