To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks |
From: | Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:58:01 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In my recent post I said: "So when we double the frequency from 160m to 75/80m, the ionospheric absorption decreases by one fourth. It would decrease even more (by one sixteenth) on 40m." I should made it more clear by saying: "So when we double the frequency from 160m to 75/80m, the ionospheric absorption decreases to 1/4 of the 160m absorption. It would decrease even more (to one sixteenth of the 160m absorption) on 40m. Thanks to Pete N4ZR for catching that. Carl _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Its not the Sunspots folks, Jeff Clarke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Its not the Sunspots folks, Jeff Clarke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks, Carl Luetzelschwab |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |