CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R

To: "'cq-contest@contesting.com'" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R
From: "Henning" <mail@oz1bii.dk>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:11:15 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
To clarify:
SO1R = Single Operator 1 Radio
SO2R = Single Operator 2 Radioes
Radio = Receiver AND Transmitter.

Vy 73 de OZ1BII Henning
------------ - - - - - - ---------------------------

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] På vegne af Dave
Edmonds
Sendt: 8. august 2017 16:43
Til: cq-contest@contesting.com
Emne: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R

The top 25 players (according to 3830scores.com) in the NAQP CW contest were
running SO2R. Congrats to N9NB a SO1R op who broke the chain of SO2R
scores.. The concern I saw was that there were no SO1R stations anywhere
near the top scores in the NAQP LP category. There was a very wide score
margin between the two types of operation too...

Is a category for number of receivers needed in the world of contesting?

How are SO1R ops doing in other contests competing against SO2Rs?

Does not having a "number of receivers" category discourage SO1Rs from
competing?

Are there any contests that have such a category?

Thoughts?

73s Dave WN4AFP
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>