CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST donovanf at starpower.net don

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST donovanf at starpower.net donovanf at starpower.net Mon Aug 26 14:23:14 EDT 2019 Previous message (by thread): ARRL DX CW Contest in QST Next message (by thread): ARRL DX CW Contest in QST Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] The DX Contest results article in September QST (now available via the ARRL homepage) is just as awful. Someone at ARRL HQ needs to undertake a serious review of how contest results are reported in QST. IMHO contest results articles should not be directed at the committed contester audience, every one of us knows where to look for the on-line results. The articles should be written to attract the interest of the not-yet-committed. 73 Frank W3LPL
From: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:36:35 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree, articles to attract new contesters would be great. Also it is nice to show more than top ten scores, many little pistol ops would love to see their callsign in the magazine. CQ Magazine still does this.

John KK9A


Frank W3LPL wrote:

The DX Contest results article in September QST (now available via the
ARRL homepage) is just as awful.


Someone at ARRL HQ needs to undertake a serious review of how contest
results are reported in QST. IMHO contest results articles should not be
directed at the committed contester audience, every one of us knows where
to look for the on-line results. The articles should be written to attract the
interest of the not-yet-committed.


73
Frank
W3LPL


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>