CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication
From: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: jim@rhodesend.net
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:43:27 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Seems to me that one of the contest put on by a Japanese group used to be
scored this way. I never participated in that particular contest, but that
wasn't the reason why.

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> wrote:

> On 11/05/2020 12:38, Shelby K4WW wrote:
> > "Judging is carried out only on the received LOGs = if a participant
> > doesn’t submit the log, then other participants will have no QSO point
> nor
> > multiplier point credits for the QSOs with him!"
> >
> > As this was a "first time ever" to actually participate, not just make a
> > few contacts, I find the unique approach toward scoring, indefensible?
>
> Contest sponsors are entitled to define whatever rules they choose.
> This one is an incentive for casual operators to submit a log, as
> otherwise they are wasting other entrants' time.  Who would want to do
> that?  :-)
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


-- 
Jim K0XU
jim@rhodesend.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>