CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why were there so many busted skimmer spots during WAE?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why were there so many busted skimmer spots during WAE?
From: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:56:32 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I doubt it.  CW Skimmer looks for multiple repetitions of a callsign (minimum 2), and keywords such as CQ and TEST to identify CQ messages. QTC messages don't fit this template.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 8/12/2020 1:20 PM, dj7ww@t-online.de wrote:
I guess Skimmers posted call signs from qtc groups sent by participants.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Barry W2UP
Sent: Mittwoch, 12. August 2020 02:54
To: CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Why were there so many busted skimmer spots during
WAE?

Title says it all.  I've never seen so many bad skimmer spots.

Barry W2UP (@W4YY for the contest)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>