I suspect if you do not turn in an RAC log they will be uniques at worst. You
being in more than one log submitted they won't even be that. They will be
counted as good QSOs (which they actually were).
Dan KI6X
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+danki6x=socal.rr.com@contesting.com> On
Behalf Of Steve Bookout
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 3:37 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RAC + 9A
Scott,
I was in the 9A contest on/off today. I specifically set my CQ message to '9A
test NR4M NR4M' to dissuade people in the RAC from calling me. After the 3rd
VE, I just entered '001' instead of 'ON', 'SK' or whatever. N1MM didn't like
what they sent and I didn't feel like arguing with them.
Then, I changed my 'TU' message to 'TU NR4M 9A TEST', and still got RAC
contestants. There were also US stations sending me serial numbers of
300 plus. Find that hard to believe that were in the 9A contest. I'm quite
sure these were people just clicking on spots and didn't have the ability to
actually copy what I was sending.
There surely will be a bunch of NIL's.
73 de Steve, NR4M
On 12/19/2020 5:30 PM, K9MA wrote:
> It's too bad these contests overlap, and that the exchanges are so
> similar. Not all those calling CQ specify which one they are in. There
> surely will be a lot of NIL penalties.
>
> 73,
>
> Scott K9MA
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|