CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Code readers

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com (cq-contest@contesting.com)" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Code readers
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:55:07 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
One thing about CW Skimmer (and perhaps the others):  While it is slow at 
decoding, I think its strength is in depicting/amplifying code in a visual 
spectrum-like display.  I have some nasty tinnitus that makes it difficult to 
copy "by ear", so I'll frequently run skimmer in "blind mode" (no computer text 
generation) and copy the dits/dahs visually to overcome the high noise level in 
my ears.

Presumably this is a tactic any CW lover with hearing issues could use.

-- 
Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+mda=n1en.org@contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
AB1J via CQ-Contest
Sent: Monday, 19 April, 2021 19.06
To: k4sbz.stan@gmail.com; ko7ss@yahoo.com
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Code readers

N1MM+ has code reading capability which can be used with  Fldigi, CWGet or a 
TNC.  

I use CWGet with N1MM+ on CW when the contest rules allow (usually it's 
forbidden when running Unassisted), but it doesn't work all that well in QRM 
and with weak signals.  I ran it last weekend in the CQMMDX and it was useful a 
handful of times.  There are times when I flub up and maybe CWGet will rescue 
me.  Not always, however.  Usually we fail in tandem.

You can always run standalone CW readers, too.


I ran some tests once using various CW readers: CWGet, MRP40, Fldigi, and the 
CW Skimmer.  The CW Skimmer was best but sometimes too slow.  The rest were of 
a group with good and bad points depending on their use, like ragchewing versus 
contesting.  Interestingly, if signals were good, some decoders worked better 
on faster CW than slower.  I ran MRP40 up to 80 WPM with good results.

IMO, though, you can never be a serious CW contester until you can copy contest 
CW yourself up to 35 WPM or more.  You don't have to be fluent at 35 WPM, just 
be able to copy calls and contest exchanges.

The CWT contests and the K1USN SSTs are great ways to learn contest CW.

Between the CWOps and K1USN activities, code readers and the RBN, CW contesting 
will live on indefinitely, even if CW use generally continues to decline.  

73,
Ken, AB1J
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>