>From ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pcluster-owner Sat Oct 8 14:05:20 1994 remote from
>blkbox
Received: from ux1.cso.uiuc.edu by blkbox.COM id aa14800; 8 Oct 94 14:05 CDT
Received: by ux1.cso.uiuc.edu id AA12575
(5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for pcluster-outgoing); Sat, 8 Oct 1994 11:41:12 -0500
Received: from gatekeeper.mcimail.com by ux1.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA12564
(5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <pcluster@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>); Sat, 8 Oct 1994 11:41:09
-0500
Received: by gatekeeper.mcimail.com (5.65/fma-120691);
id AA16674; Sat, 8 Oct 94 16:44:17 GMT
Received: from mcimail.com by mailgate.mcimail.com id aa10857;
8 Oct 94 16:40 WET
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 94 11:40 EST
From: "James R. Hill" <0006429120@mcimail.com>
To: PacketCluster <pcluster@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Pavillion Software
Message-Id: <44941008164044/0006429120PK3EM@MCIMAIL.COM>
Sender: w5robert@mcimail.com
Precedence: bulk
How many of you out there have had problems dealing with Pavillion?
In 1993 I gave Pavillion my credit card number for a years subscription
to Hamcall. I learned later on that Pavillion no longer would handle
Hamcall. I never received a refund.
Two weeks ago I faxed Pavillion requesting CT9. I have yet to hear
from Pavillion.
I think K1EA should look for a different outlet for software as
Pavillion does not act like a decent company to work with.
Ron/K6OZL
|