Jim,
> There are people who subscribe to the CT reflector who like contesting
> and a good contest a lot but they do not want to deal with the ton of
> e-mail on the CQ-Contest reflector.
I see, so now you have made the decision for them to advertise wherever and
whenever you want? Let's be clear; there are many SMART people out there
who know where to find contest info whenever they want it. It is
unnecessary for you pretend that you need to provide this service for them.
> Some of them have unsubscribed from CQ-Contest because of post contest
> write-ups by stations that have deliberately QRMed other contesters and
> then gotten on CQ-Contest to talk about how they are such great
> operators who can juggle home lives, jobs and contesting as well... like
> somehow anybody else doesn't have to do the same!
I see, so now you also speak for all those people for whom you claim to be
able to read their minds? Why don't you give me the SPECIFIC names and
callsigns of these people and let me hear from them directly. I'm sure you
can't and your that allegations are misrepresentations, as usual. As far as
your innuendo goes, you have a nasty habit of lashing out at others with
innuendo when criticized for inappropriate behavior on your part. You
never can provide meaningful details because there are none.
> As one of the largest state QSO Parties, with a large following, which
> and is supported by CT I felt that reminding some CT users who no longer
> want to subscribe to CQ Contest was appropriate.
This is nonsense. FQP has a large enough following that people know where
to find the info if and when they want it. They also know how to access
CQ-Contest and other sites if and when they want. Your pretense that you
need to "help" these people is patronizing to them. They are smart enough
to know how to set up a station, antennas and many other things.
> By the way, you can use the delete key as easily as an F1 key... a
> learned individual like yourself could even set up an e-mail filter to
> screen postings from me if that really was what this was about.
This is about your continuing to post FQP messages on reflectors whose
topics are NOT about FQP contests. Perhaps N6TR, K7LXC or some others who
have previously addressed this with you can make the point more eloquently
than I.
> I apologize to the CT-Users for this bandwidth - and encourage them to
> participate in the FQP - something KQ2Mary has not.
I see, so now it is also necessary for you to criticize me for not
participating in FQP? With that kind of attitude you can be sure that I
won't participate.
This is my last reflector post on this subject. Jim, if you feel compelled
to email again, then please do it privately to me and off the reflectot!
Bob KQ2M
> Jim, K4OJ
>
> p.s. you can further relieve congestion by editing your responses to
> e-mails by NOT including the entire original postings, Bob.
>
>
>
> Robert Shohet wrote:
> > What in blazes does the FQP have to with the CT User reflector?
> >
> > Why don't you grow up and restrain your FQP announcements to where THEY
ARE
> > APPROPRIATE like the CQ Contest reflector?!
> >
> > Bob KQ2M
> >
> >
> >>Spring is here!
> >>
> >>One of the rights of Spring, or at least April, is the changing of the
> >>county map for the Florida QSO Party.
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CT-User mailing list
> CT-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
|