owner-rfi@contesting.com wrote:
> >From k3lr Tue Mar 3 03:21:14 1998
> Received: from mail-gw3.pacbell.net (mail-gw3.pacbell.net
> [206.13.28.55])
> by dayton.akorn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA28819
> for <rfi@contesting.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 03:21:13 -0500 (EST)
>
> Received: from ww (ppp-206-170-117-82.sndg02.pacbell.net
> [206.170.117.82]) by mail-gw3.pacbell.net (8.8.8/8.7.1+antispam) with
> SMTP id AAA16904; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:21:10 -0800 (PST)
> Message-ID: <34FBBD45.68F8@pacbell.net>
To: <rfi@contesting.com>
> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 00:20:21 -0800
> From: Ed Price <edprice@pacbell.net>
> Reply-To: edprice@pacbell.net
> Organization: ESP Labs
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-PBWG (Win95; U)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: Wendell Wyly <w5fl@flash.net>
> CC: rfi@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RFI] Radio Shack WX200 Weather Station
> References: <004701bd4527$06f989a0$9b0f1ed1@wendellw>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Wendell Wyly wrote:
> >
> > I have a Radio Shack Weather Station Model WX200. I have been
> unable to RFI
> > it sufficiently to operate with my HF rig. Worse problem is on 80
> meters
> > although other bands occassionaly cause the same problem. An
> indicated
> > windspeed of 125 mph each time you key the transmitter for a few
> seconds.
> >
> > Radio Shack has only suggested filters on the leads to the unit. I
> used
> > both large clamp on ferrites and split core large ferrites. Some
> > improvement but it still does not work. Radio Shack's only other
> suggestion
> > was to move the unit further away from the antenna, which is quite
> > impractical solution for a RACES station. Also asked to talk to the
> design
> > engineer since I am an electrical engineer, only to learn that the
> design
> > engineer does not work for Radio Shack. Any suggestions
> appreciated.
> >
> > There are some other issues with the software such as it hangs your
> computer
> > up at midnight, doesn't change to new year properly, and takes 100%
> of
> > kernal processing capacity (when it only updates 10 calculation
> every 5
> > seconds). I do not think these are RFI issues, however.
> >
> > If anyone has a Weather Station that works well with HF radios,
> please let
> > me know the details.
> >
> > Wendell Wyly W5FL w5fl@flash.net
> > (A real 5 located near Weatherford Texas)
>
> Hi Wendell!
>
> Let me start with a few suggestions that are pretty generic.
> The first
> thing to remember is the SOURCE-PATH-RECEPTOR model. You gotta have
> all
> three for a problem to exist. Varying any of the three will affect the
>
> problem in some way. Try various output powers and bands. Do you still
>
> have interference putting 100 watts into a dummy load?
>
> Now, I'm not familiar with the RS model in question. Maybe
> your path
> isn't antenna radiation. Or maybe you need to shield the sensor head.
> Maybe tightly twisted data leads will help. Does the data cable
> overshield properly connect to a sensor head shield? Maybe you need to
>
> more severly bandwidth limit the data input cables than a ferrite
> clamp
> is capable of. Try some 5000pf eyelet caps with a small toroid (maybe
> 1mH) in series with the data line(s). (I am pre-supposing the base
> section has some type of shielded box! Maybe we need one?)
>
> Next, maybe you need to filter the power input to the base
> unit. And
> don't overlook the possibility of coupling onto the computer link
> cable.
>
> Eliminate some areas, come back with more data on what does
> affect the
> situation. You can kill it, uhhh, eventually.
>
> Ed
> WB6WSN
--
Submissions: rfi@contesting.com
Administrative requests: rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://www.contesting.com/rfi-faq.html
Questions: owner-rfi@contesting.com
|