> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:28:10 -0600, Ford Peterson wrote:
>
>>I'm willing to bet my next paycheck that the noise will be gone
>>if they are properly shielded by retaining the 'pairs' in the
>>proper sequence.
>
> You'd better go for a paycheck loan, Ford. :) You (and the tutorial)
> are absolutely correct that a twisted pair helps TREMENDOUSLY in
> killing DIFFERENTIAL mode coupling to/from the cable. And we have a
> lot of experience with loudspeaker cables that says that twisted
> pair is FAR superior to parallel wire (zip cord) in minimizing RFI.
>
> But twisting helps NOT AT ALL when the cable is excited COMMON MODE
> and radiates as a long wire antenna. That's what the chokes can
> reduce (a LOT).
>
> My experience with HF trash from Ethernet cable is that it is all
> COMMON MODE radiation from the cable, added (sometimes) to direct
> radiation from the box itself.
>
> Jim Brown K9YC
Jim,
My bet was a safe one. I haven't had a paycheck since 1988. I seriously doubt
I will have one any time soon. But if I do, I'll look you up on QRZ and settle
up...
Many stations use Ethernet to connect stations in a multi-op, and even connect
it directly to their radios without interference. It is possible that the
router itself is at fault. My experience has been that the power supplies
supporting the routers are more troublesome than the data exchange. My comment
was speculative, but practical. If the connectors are correct, then look
elsewhere.
Have a great day... And good luck with isolating your noise problems.
Ford-N0FP
ford@cmgate.com
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|