Considering I got into EMC while the FCC was still "going to town" on
enforcement, and doing its own testing too (complete with IIRC a frog
under the 1-meter wooden turntable OATS outside their office), I agree
with you. Congress doesn't agree with either of us; if anything costs
vendors more to comply with, they'll resist it, and if it is
ineffectively or indifferently enforced, they'll ignore it and pay the
fines when they must.
That is ONE reason I own my own spectrum analyzers, loop antennas, etc.
now that I'm (mostly) retired. It's warming up and I plan on covering a
workbench in the barn with aluminum sheet to do lighting conducted
emission tests with. Anyone want to trade two 5 uH's and one 650 uH
LISN for two 50's?
Cortland
KA5S
On 3/31/2014 7:31 PM, Dale J. wrote:
I don't see as being (or overly) rigorous. Some oversight should be implemented
by an overseeing agency. After all, this stuff is being imported, mfg here in
the US and marketed to unsuspecting consumers, with their safety in the mix to
boot.
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|