RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Cheating

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Cheating
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:37:09 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
 > Huh, of course there is a lot of justification or else we wouldn't
 > have Single Operator Low power - High Power, Assisted and
 > non-assisted.

High Power/Low Power is an artifact of the 1950's in an attempt to
"level the playing field" but it was never extended to other areas
of hardware (like antennas in the 60's and computers in the 70's).

Assisted and non-assisted are not hardware related - they deal with
OUTSIDE OPERATOR ASSISTANCE (e.g. spotting from OUTSIDE one's own
shack) and are probably the most pervasively used form of cheating
there is.).

None of this addresses the use of multiple radios to change bands
rapidly by a skilled operator (e.g. SO2R).

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV

On 6/14/2010 10:41 PM, WS7I wrote:
> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From:
> "Joe Subich, W4TV"<lists@subich.com> Date:  Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:13:24
> -0400
>
>
>> There is no justification for treating one set of SINGLE OPERATORS
>> any differently from any others based only on the hardware located
>> in their stations.
>
> Huh, of course there is a lot of justification or else we wouldn't
> have Single Operator Low power - High Power, Assisted and
> non-assisted.
>
> Using multiple radios is much different than using one radio.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
>
> _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>