Ops have been using multiple radios for as long as I have been a contester
since 1978. The only change is that the technology has improved and there
are a number of devices that make it very easy to do.
If you want a 2nd category then talk to the contest sponsors. No change is
coming from this reflector.
Mike W0MU
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Jim W7RY
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:13 AM
To: Joe Subich, W4TV
Cc: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R
In other words... More than one operator, multi op. More than one radio,
multi radio.
If you want to look for mults on the second receiver of that ONE radio,
fine. You have to change bands to work the mult. That too is fine.
Simple.
73
Jim W7RY
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok Joe.... Then is 2OSR not the same as single operator? No, their
> multi operator. No matter how many ops they have, their simply multi
operator.
> (Not talking about multi 2 or multi multi)
>
>
> So Joe... Tell me again why SO2R is does not have an advantage over a
> single radio? And why they should not be a separate class?
>
>
> 73
> Jim W7RY
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV
<lists@subich.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> My replies to Bill were only in response to his whinny "I don't want
>> to have to compete against 'their kind'" nonsense. Like SO2R or not,
>> use SO2R or not, operators who use SO2R are just as much a single
>> operator as the guy with an IC-718 and AV-640 on the back deck. SO2R
>> operators should not be prevented from competing against other single
>> operator stations any more someone who has a tribander at 70 feet
>> should be prevented from competing with those of us who are limited
>> to verticals and low wires.
>>
>> If one does not like SO2R as it is currently structured, the
>> alternative is to convince contest sponsors to adopt band change
>> limits (e.g., "n" band changes per clock hour) or a "10 minute rule."
>> Such rules significantly limit the "advantage" of SO2R techniques
>> while applying the same rules to all.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> ... Joe, W4TV
>>
>> On 6/16/2010 7:01 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
>> > I guess badgering and being obnoxious is not only limited to post
>> > made
>> by
>> > W4TV.
>> >
>> > If all hams had your attitude Ham Radio would have died before it
>> started.
>> >
>> > And I thought we were ambassadors of goodwill.
>> >
>> > Bill I think you need to use the delete key more and find a more
>> > fire
>> proof
>> > suit OM.
>> >
>> >
>> > CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1
>> > W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194
>> >
>> > "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue
>> > you
>> may
>> > never get over." Ben Franklin
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|