I agree with tu. I run LP and this weekend I got a few "CQ Test" type
exchanges. I wasn't sure whether he got me or just gave up. "TU" clears it
up.
Steve
KA2KON
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Stai" <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
To: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Cc: "Stanley Zawrotny" <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; "REFL-RTTY"
<rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Courtesy
Every run QSO I make has a TU, I think it's courteous to give a positive
acknowledgement to the other station. And it's nicer than CFM.
My S&P Qs do not have a TU. This is because having a TU in the exchange as
well as the acknowledgement would be redundant, not that I am any less
thankful. (I use the same buffer in WL for all exchanges.)
- jeff wk6i
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:50 PM, John GW4SKA <ska@bartg.org.uk> wrote:
You must have been unlucky with the guys you worked. Every one of my
1600+
contacts got a 'TU' and I saw lots send the same to me. There are still a
lot of courteous RTTY ops out there!
--
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|