RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] No 599

To: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] No 599
From: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:00:29 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
The log submission robot will not accept QSO lines with missing fields like RST.


73,
Ed W0YK
On Feb 17, 2016 2:49 PM, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How about if we just send in our Cabillo with the received exchange. If 
> after repeated tries there is no 599 in the exchange, then no 599 in the 
> Cabrillo. 
>
> e.g. regular correct exchange Cabrillo: 
> QSO:  7046 RY 2016-02-13 0002 N3QE          599 0003   FA1KE        599 
> 0001 
>
> If he doesn't send me an RST: 
> QSO:  7046 RY 2016-02-13 0002 N3QE          599 0003   FA2KE 
> 0001 
>
> I know the last time I seriously tried to compete in IOTA contest, several 
> of the biggest island ops were not sending their IOTA number. (It actually 
> takes a fair amount of time to send). I sent in my log with the Cabrillo 
> IOTA field blank for the big island ops for these guys, and got my score 
> dinged, even though I sent a message to the logcheckers that the guy was 
> not sending his IOTA number even after I asked repeatedly. 
>
> Tim N3QE 
> _______________________________________________ 
> RTTY mailing list 
> RTTY@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>