Subject: | [SECC] SS Phone 2001 |
---|---|
From: | Courtney Judd" <k4wi@earthlink.net (Courtney Judd) |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:51:26 -0500 |
Maybe I am just not getting the idea here, but I have used a database for years with CT, NA and now with Writelog. It is called super partial call check. While it doesn't guarantee accuracy, it does help with call recognition. I don't think that this is cheating at all.. cheating comes from outside help. I can always tell when I have been spotted in SS.. a big run from A and B precedents show up.. Wonder why?.. My UBN for SS last year is as follows: Raw qso's=1111 Dupes=2 Busted Qsos=33 Valid qso's =1076 Penalty Qsos=4 QSO points=2144 Mults=80 Score=171520 error rate=3.0% number of busts in other logs=27 (2.5%) most of these had W4WI vs K4WI!!! I will be on again this fall both cw and ssb looking for another sweep! cul 73's Cort K4WI |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [SECC] SS Phone 2001, Sherman Banks (W4ATL) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [SECC] SS Phone 2001, John T. Laney, III |
Previous by Thread: | [SECC] SS Phone 2001, Dan/W4NTI |
Next by Thread: | [SECC] SS Phone 2001, Sherman Banks (W4ATL) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |