[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate

from [K4SB]

Subject:	[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate
From:	k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
Date:	Mon Jan 19 21:35:37 2004

Well, about as expected.

Just when are we going to throw this board out for good?

(:<
Ed

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Dave-KB4ET [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB <= [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Gary McConville [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Sherman Banks [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Lee Hiers [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Gary McConville [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Daniel Jeswald [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Daniel Jeswald [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Lee Hiers [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Robin Gist

Previous by Date:	[SECC] NAQP Paper log, Daniel Jeswald
Next by Date:	[SECC] NAQP Paper log, Robin Gist
Previous by Thread:	[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Dave-KB4ET
Next by Thread:	[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Gary McConville
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]