SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Frequency Allocation Discussion

Subject: [SECC] Frequency Allocation Discussion
From: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:38 -0400
The discussion of who should operate where is a useless massage of 
the finger muscles!

First let me say that I am primarily a CW-type ham and participate in 
as many CW contest as I choose. I now have operated on 1 1/2 RTTY 
contest. I thoroughly enjoyed my first CQ WW RTTY contest this past 
weekend and found the ops to be very polite and extremely good at 
what they do. While I think that ALL hams should only operate CW, I 
actually do realize that there are numerous modes available in this 
HOBBY, and that since it is a hobby, everyone should operate in what 
ever mode they enjoy. But we ALL should be flexible.

No matter what mode contest happens, it is 'natural' to spread out in 
frequency if participation is heavy. We do it in ALL CW contest, the 
RTTY guys do it, and the SSB guys do it. And that is the way it is! 
In the spirit of competition, we just do not stop to think who we may 
inconvenience while operating in a contest.

W4BW, the ex-FCC chairman got us the WARC bands, mainly so 
non-contesters would have some place to operate if their favorite 
frequencies were being used during a contest. Unfortunately, he could 
not account for us hard-headed types who would rather complain about 
a contest, rather than take advantage of the WARC frequencies.

The ITU Regions established the frequency range of the ham bands; 
they did not specify any mode of operation. The FCC bought into the 
ITU Region 2 frequency allocations, but the FCC did NOT make any 
band, except 60m, mode specific. The ARRL (not my favorite friend) 
did their best to 'suggest' band plans, so everyone would have a 
'protected' place to operate. Of course that ARRL has no enforcement 
authority (thank goodness!). The FCC 'blessed' the ARRL's band plan, 
but I don't believe they ever made it a legal requirement.

BUT everybody wants to pick their own frequency to operate. For 
instance, the QRP community chose, on 40m, to use 7.040 MHz as their 
calling frequency. Tuff Tootie! The band plan has, for years, 
designated (suggested) that 7.040 MHz is a RTTY DX window, 
specifically because ITU Region's did not coordinate frequency 
allocations for all parts of the world. The ITU frequency allocations 
for US/VE DO NOT RULE the world. So we have to do something we really 
don't like to do, i.e., we have to cooperate (gasp!). And obviously 
the QRP community did not check the band plan, when decreeing 7.040 
MHz was to be their 'calling frequency'.

The discussion about the RTTY gang 'should' stay up above x.xxx 
frequency is very one-sided. Simply because when there is a CW 
contest, it's for certain that the CW ops are NOT going to honor ANY 
band plan. It just doesn't work that way. Tit-for Tat!! The same 
goes, of course, for SSB. Every SSB contest, it never takes very long 
for the 'old boys network of SSB ops, to raise cain because they were 
stepped on by 'idiot' SSB contesters, not realizing (admitting) that 
'THEIR NET' frequency that they have been using for years, belongs to 
EVERYBODY.

This discussion has been on-going for years; RTTY has now been 
included simply because the mode is gaining in popularity. The 
discussion will continue for years, as long as there is no legal (FCC 
requirement) for mode/frequency operations. Most likely because all 
hams have a huge lack of ability to accept change and we are 
certainly not an adaptable bunch of folks.

Besides that, the bands are open!

Tom - W4BQF


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>