SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] CQWW Error rate?

Subject: [SECC] CQWW Error rate?
From: Kt4zb at aol.com (Kt4zb at aol.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:15:36 -0400 (EDT)
Great Question Greg - I've often wondered the same.
 
I got credit for 921 QSOs out of 926 for CQWW
 
.1% (1) incorrect and .4% (4) not in log  - lost 1 zone which really  hurt.
 
Score was dropped 1.7%
 
Logging makes a big difference - in the ARRL DX contest KS1J and I were  
only 771 points apart out of 1,009.785 ponts or .07% (less than 1 QSO).   
Don't know who had the best log yet.
 
Best - Jere
KT4ZB , Savannah, GA
 
 
 
In a message dated 8/27/2011 4:30:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
gregpotter at charter.net writes:

Hi Folks,

What would be a good "error %"  in a contest like CQWW CW?  
% Calls copied incorrectly?
% Calls not in log?

Is there a club competition for "most accurate logs" or "least  accurate 
logs"?  

How good is good and how bad is bad?  Is perfection really  achievable?  

73 de Greg NM2L






_______________________________________________
SECC  mailing  list
SECC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20110827/0ef58f59/attachment.html
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>