SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] question on email - spamarrest

Subject: [SECC] question on email - spamarrest
From: jimworth at me.com (Jim Worthington)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 07:59:09 -0400
I agree. I find it annoying when someone emails me a question or request for 
for help and then expects me to deal with their spam service to be able to 
reply.

You may also find you miss emails from organizations and professionals you want 
to hear from, such as your bank, investment firm, lawyer, doctor, dentist, 
ARRL, radio club, etc. In most cases, they won't take the time to deal with 
filling out a form for the privilege of emailing you.

I find that having a good email filter that places suspected spam in a separate 
"Junk" folder and learns from your decisions about what is junk mail, works 
best. I can scan my Junk folder once or twice a day in less than a minute, 
based on the sender and subject. Most of the time, everything in the folder is 
spam and I can delete it all with two clicks. In my case, the filtering is done 
by Apple Mail, but there are plenty of other effective ones.

Jim AD4J

On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Lee Hiers <lee.hiers at gmail.com> wrote:

> Another problem with Spamarrest and similar "services" is that some of us 
> refuse to deal with the BS.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20130423/ddd672ad/attachment-0001.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>