TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 60M.. Monitoring

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 60M.. Monitoring
From: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:09:27 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Because you can hear both stations does not mean that they can hear each other.
This is one problem with the secondary allocation concept. One Primary station
sending a signal to another may have good propagation to the receiving location and the secondary station may also but very poor propagation between the primary and
secondary stations, they could be in each others skip zone.

73
Bill wa4lav



At 07:38 PM 7/2/2003 -0700, wmlb@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Well it is still 4 hours PLUS here on the west coast...

I did check the frequencies (channels) a while ago..
Channel 3.. 5.3665 is occupied by some sort of digital signal. Must
be one of those "primary" operations. Unfortunately, as I was
monitoring, somebody started tuning up right on top of the digital
sig. Not a good thing....but I guess there is going to be those  who
just don't get it or don't figure the rules are for them..

Let's hope that things get off to a good start..

Bill, W6WLB

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>