TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp
From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:56:06 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
When mine caught fire, they had to fabricate two new boards I believe.  The 
closest transistors they could get to the originals had higher gain and were 
thus more prone to self-oscillation (the malady that started the fire in my 
amp).  They lowered the gain with minor circuit modifications but cautioned 
me that they wouldn't work on it or any other Hercules 444 in the future. 
This was *well* over 10 years ago, probably 15-18 years.  I didn't own that 
amp very long.

I sold it to a fellow who intended to remove the RF strips and replace them 
with some Motorola units.  I don't know if he did that or not but it would 
be an excellent change.

73 and Merry Christmas,
Mike N4NT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Wright" <graham-g4fuj@talk21.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 4:16 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp


I don't have diagrams or info. on these, but surely
there must be a nearish equivalent transistor to use
in the finals on these, even if some modification is
required to driver stage and PSU?

73
Graham     G4FUJ

--- Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net> wrote:

> Correct me if I'm wrong:
>
> - The Hercules 444 amp was declared unrepairable at
> least 10 years ago
> due to the inability to obtain the proper
> replacement final
> transistors.
>
> - The Hercules II is still easily repaired as the
> finals are readily
> available (and even a good sub exists as I
> understand it.)
>
> Clark
> WA3JPG 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>