TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm?

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm?
From: "n4dsp" <n4dsp@triad.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:03:00 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I sure did miss the smiley face Perry! 
My apologies. Merry Christmas to you and your loved ones.

73
john-n4dsp

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <w8au@sssnet.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm?


> At 04:48 PM 12/20/06, n4dsp wrote:
> 
>>Dont be such a Downer!! Geez congratulate the guy for this
>>remarkable achievement! Next thing someone will comment
>>that the program does not have real life conditions like qsb,
>>qrm etc.
>>----------------------
> 
> John:  Did you miss the "smiley face"?  No criticism here...  Since 
> ole' Ted was the copying champ eons ago, It would be interesting to 
> see what he might think about it.  :-)
> 
>> > Did anyone miss the criteria for this competition?  The only thing
>> > they have to receive is "call signs."  No text.  You know that there
>> > will be at least one number with letters before and after.  This
>> > allows competitors to narrow their concentration and up their scores.
>> >
>> > Ya think Ted McElroy would condone this limited style of copying? :-)
>> >
>> > Perry  w8au
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>