| To: | martin@ok1rr.com, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec the SSB company? |
| From: | Michael Wilke <wb4aql@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:18:23 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I`ve been wondering the same thing... Mike WB4AQL On 6/21/10, Martin <martin@ok1rr.com> wrote: > > It struck me dumb to see the 'Ten-Tec, the SSB company'. Our late Al > Kahn, K4FW, must turn in his grave... > > Should it be a response to the no-code expansion? What's the TT's > strategy for the future? With lack of support of Orion (565), some less > sophisticated solutions (no memory tuner in 565, some software > glitches...) will TT also leave the tradition of great CW features? > > 73 > Martin, OK1RR > > > _______________________________________________ > TenTec mailing list > TenTec@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec the SSB company?, Dennis Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec the SSB company?, Andrew Moore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec the SSB company?, Andrew Moore |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec the SSB company?, Barry N1EU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |