To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] RX-366? |
From: | Rsoifer--- via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Rsoifer@aol.com, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:44:56 -0400 (EDT) |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
If I were a serious contester, rather than someone who just plays around in them for an hour or two, I'm sure I would have ordered the RX-366 for my otherwise fully loaded O II. However, all I use the sub RX for is pile-up spotting (no, I don't have Skimmer) and, would you believe, general coverage reception (as in KPH/KSM etc.). The stock sub RX pretty much meets my needs, such as they are. So, here's one vote for making it an option on the O III, rather than standard equipment. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions, Lee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwood's impression of the FLEX 6x00, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX-366?, Lee |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwood's impression of the FLEX 6x00, John Henry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |