VK6VZ wrote:
>Please guys, don't take discussions about 160m antennas and principles off
>the topband reflector. I have only room for one radio obsession in my life
>(160m) and time for one reflector - my feeling is lots of other people are
>in the same boat.
KM1H wrote:
>Eric, thank you for a most thoughtful response. I would rather wait for
>the new Antenna/Technical reflector to be activated in order to discuss
>this and further my education. That should happen very soon.
Gentlemen:
No one will be forced to take discussions of 160 meter content
off this reflector as long as they are carried on in a civil manner,
without personal insults, taunts and innuendos. I have ZERO TOLERANCE for
the latter and persons wishing to do so will find themselves unsubscribed
if they choose to do so. For your information, I repeated our purpose
statement recently and will be happy to send another copy to anyone who
missed it. As the last sentence of that statement states, "Minimize noise,
minimize bandwidth, maximize 160 information, act like gentlemen and enjoy!"
73, Bill W4ZV
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
|