To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Series Fed vs Shunt Fed Towers |
From: | Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:38:50 -0300 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Over the past week several interesting comments were made on the
advantages of a shunt fed tower over a direct fed insulated tower. I
was convinced long ago after listening to the John Mulaney (Mulaney and
Associates) that a folded monopole has significant advantages in several
important areas for the topbander including; lightning protection,
simplicity of matching, increased radiation efficiency, and increased
bandwidth. In 1996 Ron Rackley along with Bobby Cox, James Moser and
Tom King of Kintronics presented a paper at the NAB convention entitled
"An Efficiency Comparison: AM/Medium Wave Vs. Skirt Fed Radiators."
(http://www.dlr.com/dlrweb/papers/nabpaper/nabpaper.htm) Most amateurs I
have talk to about this use single wire shunt feeds, rather than a three
or four wire cage, of #10 wire or larger. Depending upon spacing
considerations of that single wire, sometimes results are not as
convincing and matching becomes difficult. The writers of the paper also tested the difference between a 120-radial, 30-radial and a single ground rod for a tower of 98.3 degrees and 61.5 degrees electrical height. All experimental tests were conducted on 1680 Khz with 400 watts while modeling used the NEC-4.1 developed by Dr. Gerald Burke of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. To summarize briefly their findings: (1) No major differences in field strength between the folded unipole and series fed test cases. (2) The folded unipole was not found to have a significantly better radiation efficiency than the series fed for a given tower and ground system. (3) No major differences in bandwidth for either system except when a skirted series fed tower has the skirt connected at both top and bottom. The paper is 11 pages long and is a must read especially for persons wanting to decide which way to proceed in tower construction. Of course the shunt fed tower is a better choice for anyone wanting to mount beams and other antennas which seems to be the case in most of the amateur applications. 73 Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Rohn Tower for 160/80 antenna, Earl W Cunningham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: End or Centre Feed?, Roger Parsons |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Rohn Tower for 160/80 antenna, Dave Anderson, K4SV |
Next by Thread: | Topband: End or Centre Feed?, Roger Parsons |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |