To: | Topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Antenna Analyzers |
From: | ABowenN4OO <abowen@nettally.com> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:40:41 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
In Compendium 7, there is a very comprehensive article by AC6LA, "T-Time
For The Analyzers". He evaluated 4 devices: MFJ 259B, Autek RF 1 and VA 1, AEA CIA-HF. A summary of his results showed that the 259B had the smallest margin of error and the VA 1 had the largest margin of error. Before drawing any overall conclusions, one should read the article, study the charts and read the bibliography. Each device has advantages and disadvantages. I own the 259B and the Autek RF 1. I find the resistance and SWR measurements in fairly close agreement. Reactance is another matter. The numbers I measure are not accurate enough to design matching networks. I subsequently constructed a sort of universal L/C network (plugs, jacks and jumpers) that I take to the base of the vertical or the end of a transmission line. I then adjust the network for 1:1 SWR, measure the values of L and C with the RF 1 and construct the network. It works every time provided the operator does not make some dumb mistake such as a poor connection to ground. INK N4OO _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Re: core inductance and current, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Re: core inductance and current, K9AY |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Topband: Autek VA1 Users/Owners ??, Bob Tellefsen |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Autek VA1 Users/Owners ??, Brad Rehm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |