Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: WA0RCR Questioned

To: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: WA0RCR Questioned
From: "Kenneth J. Fattmann" <na0y@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:36:46 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I live about ten (10) airline miles from WAØRCR and he splatters over the 50
Khz here at my QTH. Really a nuisance here in St. Peters. MO.

Ken NAØY








----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: WA0RCR Questioned


> > I can just barely copy this "broadcast" from my QTH on
> > the West coast, using a beverage.  How well do other
> > west coast'ers copy it?  I use it as a beacon to test
> > receive antennas.  IMHO, the frequency of it should be
> > moved above 1.9 MHz to allow another QSO slot in prime
> > frequency territory.
> >
> > Rick N6RK
>
> 1.9MHz?  How about 1.997MHz?  This nuisance 'broadcast,' which is likely
illegal anyway, is full scale in MN.  Since there is no "communicating"
going on, then it should move out of the meaningful portion of the band.
>
> Ford-N0FP
> ford@cmgate.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>