To: | "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>, <Topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: EZNEC prediction help |
From: | "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:50:58 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Probably not so complicated as you might think. In any event, any 1/4 vertical over anything other than salt water or a copper-plated ranch is going to lose a lot of power to ground loss. Typically -3 dB at best and perhaps a lot worse. You can confirm this easily in EZNEC by changing the ground medium to salt water and watching the gain skyrocket. Problem is basically that vertically polarized radiation does not bounce well off dirt. We overcome this in the very immediate vicinity by lacing the dirt with good conducting material, radials. But beyond that it's soak it up and energize the worms. A max gain of 1.41 dB only means that in ONE direction and elevation anyway, the radiation is 1.41 dB better than an isotropic radiator in the same direction. I don't use mininec ground for gain estimates any more. I think it's optimistic. 73, Guy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net> The problem I'm having is understanding the various readings, mainly the 3d Max Gain and the average gain. A full size 1/4 wave 160 vertical shows a 1.41 db max 3D gain and an average gain of -3.63. Used Mininec/medium ground.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: 160 dx from down south, N5ue |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: EZNEC prediction help, Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: EZNEC prediction help, Rick Darwicki |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: EZNEC prediction help, Tom Rauch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |