| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading" |
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:54:18 -0500 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> > Linear loading is less efficient than coil, base loading worst, top loading > is the best,... > This is absolutely true, and thoroughly proven and documented. Unless one's circumstances are very unusual, nothing except top loading should even be considered. 73 Mike www.w0btu.com _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Weatherproof enclosures?, Mike Waters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: 160 metre vertical with 'top loading', Tom Boucher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading", DF3KV |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading", Lup Schlueter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |