To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:44:44 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
IF they are operating there illegally, it would not be "malicious interference". It would be like intentionally calling CQ on top of a CBer on 10m. But you make some good points. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:21 PM, <mstangelo@comcast.net> wrote: > ... How do you know that the beacon user is breaking the law in his > jurisdiction? > > In any case jamming should not be proposed as a solution. Amateur radio > operators should not cause malicious interference. ... > _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Ground conductivity, permittivity measurement, Paul Christensen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux, mstangelo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux, Rick Stealey |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux, mstangelo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |