Bob. I am a broadcast engineer and very capable of measuring ground-wave
signals. The FCC does exactly that where issuing citations for pre-dawn
AM broadcast stations who are licensed for QRP and actually running QRO.
This method has been used for many years.
Ground wave measurement lack the variables you speak of. Actually my
post was in sorts complimentary to KP4KE's "magic 160 meter antenna"
which should in fact if it works this way should be published in the
Proceedings of the IEEE, don't you think?
Herb, KV4FZ
On 12/17/2015 11:48 AM, Robert Harmon wrote:
Boxbe <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> This message is eligible for
Automatic Cleanup! (k6uj@pacbell.net) Add cleanup rule
<https://www.boxbe.com/popup?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxbe.com%2Fcleanup%3Ftoken%3D2DTIFrLimSp%252BhSqFSWPlPGpGfrFs8Yx2sou4r%252Bccrz93Z1cMP3pVK5wZkLEFg82aWVJXw9j35AlFBHeZz6vihItZJsAax81dJyZWDRhJ0FQx8EydgsKEhDgABC%252B0Bda4D6pzSiP7GxY%253D%26key%3DPOSkL6N0PYx0vhEg2c51JhKs3agUe0ovnxicXZ1jQ%252Fo%253D&tc_serial=23686016985&tc_rand=1478989256&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001>
| More info
<http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=23686016985&tc_rand=1478989256&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001>
Herb,
Herb,
In order for us to respond to your allegations you will need to
provide support evidence. We will need details on his actual antenna
configuration, was he using a counterpoise of some sort, is he on a
hill, how close is he to the water ? Do you have proof that he was
running more than 5 watts ?
Comparing his results to your test is meaningless, there are too many
variables to consider.
You have the burden of proof. Either provide factual evidence to
support your allegations or give
KP4KE an apology for potentially damaging his reputation.
Bob
K6UJ
On 12/17/15 5:38 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote:
Well not to appear to be entirely disputatious we should carefully
consider KP4KE CQ WW 160 meter QRP entry in 2005 which he said he
accomplished with 4.7 watts to a "magical antenna" which he called a
"double bazooka" at 60 feet both for RX and TX. While claiming to
work 42 countries with this magical antenna (which is actually a low
dipole) in a few hours of operating, I thought I would try and see
what 5 watts could actually in fact really do on TB. Using a 1/4 wave
vertical and 12 Beverages a few weeks later, and many days after that
when the band conditions where hot, I called CQ for 4 hours each
night without a single reply. During this contest I recall hearing
NP4A and Pedro's great set up running full power, and very high
dipole at 200' and the signals were always the same on 160 at my
location. So either KP4KE has a "magic antenna" or his "QRP" entry in
the CQ WW 160 meter QRP category totally lacked credulity.
Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
2005 KP4KE SO QRP 160M 37,345 364/13/42
On 12/17/2015 7:56 AM, Michel Spelier wrote:
The title was changed to better describe the original question.
This topband newcomer asked what had happened to the topband
conditions, given
the rare intercontinental Low Power to Low Power CW QSO’s,
even when riding upon sun propagation enhancements, as noted in this
log, during
the last 6 or 7 winter topband contests.
(the last 3 years = topband newcomer)
(snip)
73,
Michel, ON7EH
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|