For what it is worth, I have a Pixel up and running and several 200 foot
terminated bogs. The Pixel is not a bad antenna but it will not beat a
properly cut and terminated BOG on 160M. My Pixel has been in operation for
2 years and the BOGS the same. The Pixel is mounted about 5 feet above the
ground and 200 feet away from the house. The BOGS use the DX engineering
termination units.
Mike
AB4KJ
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:00 AM, <topband-request@contesting.com> wrote:
> Send Topband mailing list submissions to
> topband@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> topband-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> topband-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Topband digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Pixel vs BOG ( K1FZ-Bruce )
> 2. Re: Pixel vs BOG (Kenneth Grimm)
> 3. Re: Pixel vs BOG (Chortek, Robert L.)
> 4. Re: Pixel vs BOG (donovanf@starpower.net)
> 5. Re: Pixel vs BOG (David Harmon)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:55:42 -0400
> From: " K1FZ-Bruce " <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
> To: Topband <topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Topband: Pixel vs BOG
> Message-ID: <20160425095542.nmyidn6tsckkk0wo@webmail.myfairpoint.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Mixed reviews.
> ?
> Pixel loop antenna vs 200 foot BOG antenna at ? VO1HP.??
> www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTXvcEwgUsU
> ?
> 73
> ?
> Bruce-k1fz
> www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:25:04 -0400
> From: Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu>
> To: Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
> Cc: Topband <topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG
> Message-ID:
> <CAN1acjaORrbOEqJbwjZZH0-3xKyY9sa1npV=
> E5UFQSQCFGm3OA@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Wow! The BOG blows the Pixel loop away. The loop sounds like my
> vertical! I wonder if there might be a feedline problem? Surely the loop
> isn't meant to be that noisy.
>
> 73,
>
> Ken - K4XL
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, K1FZ-Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net> wrote:
>
> > Mixed reviews.
> >
> > Pixel loop antenna vs 200 foot BOG antenna at VO1HP.
> > www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTXvcEwgUsU
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Bruce-k1fz
> > www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:31:30 +0000
> From: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
> To: Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu>
> Cc: Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>, Topband <topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG
> Message-ID: <A8539975-A3B8-4E2C-8780-8E313FC19562@berliner.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> It was not clear the loop was rotated to null the noise. IF SO, that's a
> BIG improvement in SN
>
> Bob AA6VB
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 25, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Wow! The BOG blows the Pixel loop away. The loop sounds like my
> > vertical! I wonder if there might be a feedline problem? Surely the
> loop
> > isn't meant to be that noisy.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Ken - K4XL
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, K1FZ-Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Mixed reviews.
> >>
> >> Pixel loop antenna vs 200 foot BOG antenna at VO1HP.
> >> www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTXvcEwgUsU
> >>
> >> 73
> >>
> >> Bruce-k1fz
> >> www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html
> >> _________________
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:38:08 -0400 (EDT)
> From: donovanf@starpower.net
> To: Topband <topband@contesting.com>
> Cc: Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>, Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu>
> Subject: Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG
> Message-ID:
> <1060922804.12103689.1461598688811.JavaMail.root@starpower.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi Ken,
>
>
> Small diameter "magnetic" loops such as the Pixel can be very
> effective in nulling a single vertically polarized local RFI source,
> fortunately most local RFI sources are vertically polarized. Their
> deep narrow beamwidth null is also very useful for determining the
> location of an RFI source.
>
>
> A small diameter loop provides no useful directivity for skywave
> propagated signals (such as the atmospheric noise in VO1HP's
> video) because the polarization of the incoming wave is constantly
> changing.
>
>
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Kenneth Grimm" <grimm@sbc.edu>
> To: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
> Cc: "Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 3:25:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG
>
> Wow! The BOG blows the Pixel loop away. The loop sounds like my
> vertical! I wonder if there might be a feedline problem? Surely the loop
> isn't meant to be that noisy.
>
> 73,
>
> Ken - K4XL
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, K1FZ-Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net> wrote:
>
> > Mixed reviews.
> >
> > Pixel loop antenna vs 200 foot BOG antenna at VO1HP.
> > www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTXvcEwgUsU
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Bruce-k1fz
> > www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:45:22 -0500
> From: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
> To: "'Kenneth Grimm'" <grimm@sbc.edu>, "'Bruce'"
> <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
> Cc: "'Topband'" <topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG
> Message-ID: <001701d19f09$7c0c54c0$7424fe40$@sbcglobal.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On the vid....he says the Pixel is 30' high.
> That is too high.
> My Pixel is nowhere near that noisy.
> It is 7' high located in the clear.
>
>
> 73
>
> David Harmon
> K6XYZ
> Sperry, OK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth
> Grimm
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 10:25 AM
> To: Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
> Cc: Topband <topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG
>
> Wow! The BOG blows the Pixel loop away. The loop sounds like my vertical!
> I wonder if there might be a feedline problem? Surely the loop isn't meant
> to be that noisy.
>
> 73,
>
> Ken - K4XL
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, K1FZ-Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net> wrote:
>
> > Mixed reviews.
> >
> > Pixel loop antenna vs 200 foot BOG antenna at VO1HP.
> > www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTXvcEwgUsU
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Bruce-k1fz
> > www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Topband Digest, Vol 160, Issue 25
> ****************************************
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|