On 80 I listen on the K3 with the Waller Flag at 95 feet es the Hi-Z 8
in Diversity Receive and transmit on the M2 rotary 106 feet..
I kill them on this band.
160 is harder on RX as I use the K3 as above and also the Ultra-Quiet
IC-7610 with only the Hi-Z 8 es transmit on the 100 foot shunt fed 45G
tower.
73,
John, W4NU
On 11/28/2018 1:48 PM, VE6WZ Steve wrote:
Agreed...
Diversity RX is a game changer.
If you have never used it you don’t know what you are missing.
Beverages and 9 circle rx array used here in diversity and for the weak ones on
160 it makes the difference between Q5 and almost no copy. On 80m the Beverages
and 2el Yagi are used in diversity with similar results.
Steve Ve6wz
From Babcocks iPhone
On Nov 28, 2018, at 9:54 AM, <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
<daraymond@iowatelecom.net> wrote:
There is simply no substitute for diversity reception. It has proven its
worth to virtually all who have ever used it. 73 to all. . . Dave, W0FLS
-----Original Message----- From: Yuri Blanarovich
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 11:13 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Polarization on 160m
Speaking of "two ears"
Going back to using two Drake R4B receivers, two antennas, one on each
ear, there would be times when "two ears" heard the signal, while
switching to each other there would be nil. I think that was some DSP
going on in the head.
BTW Drake R4B is still one of the best receivers for weak signals
reception, no crystal filters in the path to fuzzy the signals. LC in IF
chain. DSRs are now very close.
Yuri, K3BU
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Tree wrote:
WIll add my two cents to this discussion.
One thing I have experience with is diversity reception both on 160 and 80
meters. Often - I would be using my TX antenna in one ear and a beverage
in another. On 80 meters, the TX antenna was a 4 square. On 160, either a
vertical or two element phased array.
I found on 80 meters - when running JAs in a contest - if I only used one
antenna - I would almost always miss one letter of the JA's callsign and
have to ask for a repeat... but with diversity - the signal would float
around in my head and I could almost always get the whole call the first
time.
I can hear this effect on 160 as well as signals float around. I can't
prove this is just polarization - as it could be different angles of signal
arrival - but it sure re-enforces the point that having different kinds of
RX antennas for different situations is never a bad thing.
I have experienced some sunrise openings where a low dipole has worked
well. There are times when my directive receive antennas seem to be broken
- which is another indication of high angles.
Tree N6TR
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:51 AM Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
Not knowing about "gyros", but when operating and having vertical and
horizontal antennas available, I remember times when QSB was happening
on one antenna, switching to the "other" polarization antenna would
bring the signals up.
My conclusion was that at the times the signal's polarization was
rolling around, especially when far DX.
Yuri, K3BU, VE3BMV, VE1BY
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:22 AM, Robert Parkes via Topband wrote:
Polarization on 160m
Interesting discussion and one I suspect we wish could fully
comprehend !
When the wave front meets the ionosphere and the wave splits the
critical frequency is different for the two waves, commonly known as
foc and fxc.
This difference (from memory) is half the gyrofrequency and can often
be seen on Ionosonde plots with two sets of reflections. The gyro
frequency depends on the strength of the magnetic field at that point
of the ionosphere so can vary from 700kHz to 1.4MHz where the radiated
wave interacts with the Ionosphere Layer be it, E layer or F layer.
Being radio amateurs and pushing the envelope we are trying to make
that illusive QSO so we need to excite a propagation path which is
normally at the limit in order to chase the DX.
Assuming conditions are favourable, and if the angle of arrival and
critical frequency is such that it favours both wave fronts then for a
single and multi-hop transmission both the O-wave and the X-wave will
be propagated.
The higher frequency of the two wave fronts, the X-wave may propagate
which could result in a QSO whilst those around us may not have quite
the same favourable conditions and only the O-wave is propagated on a
differeing path while the X-Wavecould fall by the wayside and not be
propagated.
One result of all this variability could result in what has been
called spotlight or torchlight propagation. I recall Eric K3NA giving
a talk along these lines when referring to 3B7C 160m operations and
how that spotlight moved across North America during the course of his
opening to the US.
There is a possibility that Circular Polarisation would assist
with both the O and X wave modes of propagation and it could be argued
that a "compromise" Inv-L antenna provides this with its Vertical and
Horizontal elements making up the antenna and resulting mixed
polarisation.After all a number of amateurs have had good success with
an Inv-L.
73sBob ParkesG3REP(ex - S21YP, 4S7RPG, A45XF, VS5RP, P29PR)
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|