Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: GDT's for receive ant's

To: KEN CARUSO <wo1n@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: GDT's for receive ant's
From: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 13:14:02 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
   The PDF that Ken provided is the more comprehensive version of the NCJ 
article.

   The attached also discusses some of the design considerations at VP6DX 
(2008).

73,
   — Eric K3NA

> On Jul 30, 2023, at 12:03, KEN CARUSO <wo1n@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> I have some design experience for POTS lightning protection. GDTs were 
> sometimes used but by the end of my design career we were using mostly solid 
> state devices (TVS and other SCR like devices).
> 
> Our golden rule was to avoid turning common mode surges into differential 
> mode as even the solid state devices would have differing turn-on thresholds 
> which would result in higher voltage stresses on the downstream electronics. 
> This meant the protection would go only across tip to ring and never 
> tip-to-ground or ring to ground. GDT's were even worse in this respect.
> 
> Having said that, I would recommend you dig around for articles written by 
> K3NA related to phased array receive antennas used on Ducie etc. He thought 
> through protection schemes that involved GDTs, Fuses and TVS solutions. Very 
> thorough designs.
> 
> I remember his designs were documented in the Sept/Oct 2008 and Nov/Dec 2008 
> NCJs but I was not able to find an archived copy on the web, though this 
> seems to be a version of what I remember:
> 
> https://ncjweb.com/bonus-content/200807NCJVP6DXreceiveantenna1.pdf
> 
> 73,
> 
> Ken - WO1N
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>