> Don't know how he came up with 584 foot length back in
the
> middle 50's, but it models well. Per AO, these are the
> results of Lloyd's array:
>
> Freq 3.510 3.795 7.005 14.005 14.195 18.110 21.015 28.050
>
> Gain, 6.4 7.14 10.4 8.9 8.9 10.5 9.9 9.9 dBi
>
> Zr 283 165 176 522 2985 414 405 865 ohms
>
> Zi -j1144 j69 -j371 j752 -j1073 j534 -j872 j869 ohms
>
> SWR 12.4 2.8 4.46 4.19 7.51 3.23 6 4.14 :1
> @450 ref
In general, long wire arrays, Vee's, Rhombics, etc
(unterminated varities) are liable to show large swings in
reactance (and sometimes resistance) as you sweep over a
band, as your simulation indicates. This is why tuned open
wire feeders are still the feed of choice, rather than to
come up with some 'magic' length that will permit some sort
of balun at the feedpoint with coax feed.
Terminated V-beams or rhombics are another animal. These
can be designed to present a much more 'level' load over a
2 to 4:1 frequency range.
With today's automatic antenna tuners, the hassle of
finding non-reactive terminating resistors of sufficient
power level might be overcome by the convenience of 'no
manual tune' operation.
If you don't need the 'auto tune' functionality, I'd
strongly suggest locating or building a tuner designed to
drive balanced lines, like my Johnson Matchbox tuners. No
balun/core heating/arcing to be concerned with.
Big Vee's and rhombics are neat. Back in the early 70's,
we strung a (roughly) 600 ft. per leg rhombic between the
two engineering buildings and the physics buliding at W8UM,
pointed at Japan. I don't recall which contest it was used
in, but it was nice to have a continuous pileup of JA's
that the majority of other folks couldn't even hear! That
antenna came down quickly, as it was a 100% illegal
installation, but boy, did it work, with an average height
of 100 ft or so!
----------------------------------------
Mark Shaum K9TR
mashaum@fcg.net
Central Illinois Grid EN50
---------------------------------------
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|