Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Tower Height question

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tower Height question
From: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 20:27:57 -0500
I never noticed slop like that on the Tri-Ex, Joe.
The inside of the legs were clean like a rail road track
all the way up.

You still have no problem...I think most of these stories
about crank-ups not having continuity are old wive's tales
from the cheapie tower days.

Not only do you have the raising cables running the entire length,
but you must put all coax and rotor cables on the inside of the tower
for shunt feeding. Make sure the coax shield to your yagi is grounded
to the tower at the antenna end and at the bottom. Polyphaser makes
great hardware for this.  The matching system must be an Omega
match, because you have no choice where to put the drop wire but at
the top of a section. I would put it at the section nearest the middle
of the tower for starters. This should be a killer antenna for 160 as my
LM-470D was.

GL!
Phil, K5PC



>
>On Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:53:37 -0500 "Phil Clements" <philk5pc@tyler.net>
>writes:
>snip
>> Another good thing about a 70 foot crank-up is that is is several
>> times stronger when cranked down to 50 feet which gives great
>>performance on 15 and  10m when the WX is bad.
>> You can shunt feed the whole thing for 80m and 160m. It will be a
>> killer on  those two bands as a top loaded vertical.
>
>Okay, so I have the 89 ft crank up US Tower and some of the guys
>around here say I should shunt feed it for 160.  Question...  is the
>crank up tower electrically stable ?  I mean, the telescoping
>sections are not always in contact, are they?  I wouldn't think so,
>as I have looked up at my tower from the base when the wind was
>gusting back and forth, left and right, and it just looks like  if you
>tried to get continuity on such a tower you would be just fooling
>yourself.
>
>I would like to try shunt feed, but seems to me it is a hit or miss.
>Maybe blow the AMP when the tower tilted a bit and continuity
>went south.
>
>73, de Joe AA4NN
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>