We may be into another "Apples Vs Oranges" debate here
> FORCE 12: C3, C3S, C3SS versus Tennadyne: T-6, T-8 and T-10?
If we're into similar boom length comparisons, it should be C3S Vs. T6, and
C3 Vs. T8. The T10 has a 24 foot boom
> Expected Pattern (mounted at 65 feet above sandy soil in west-central
> Florida
Since Force 12's in CA, and Tennadyne's in TX, that may be tough to do
(unless they just show you a computer pattern). Actually, that's a good way
for you to get a couple free antennas. Almost as good a way as having a
DXpedition (hehehehehe) ;) ;)
> "Gain at 74' includes ground reflection gain and is the computed maximum
> forward gain of the antenna over real, average ground at a height of 74',
> as
> compared to a dipole in free space.
Which is going to cause a problem in comparisons unless Tennadyne has 74
foot towers in the same sort of environment as Force 12.
Since I suspect both antennas are going to be within a dB or 2 of each
other, things like environment are really going to make a difference here.
The advantages of one environment over the other just may be worth that 2
dB.
We need someone UNBIASED to make the comparisons in the SAME ENVIRONMENT on
the SAME TOWER, repeat them OVER TIME, against some sort of FIXED CONTROL
and post it here.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|